Tag Archives: crisis communications

Don’t Forget to Think When Crisis Strikes

Rick Amme has an excellent piece in yesterday’s Ragan.com newsletter that I recommend highly.

In “[Nine] Popular Crisis Responses that Don’t Always Work,” Amme correctly points out 1) just because you are aware of the crisis doesn’t mean the rest of the world is aware (or necessarily cares), and 2) it’s more important to think than to speak.

As Hall of Fame Coach John Wooden would say, “be quick, but don’t hurry.”

Marketers and business owners take their brand reputations very seriously. This is a good thing, but it often impairs one’s thinking when bad things happen.

As human beings, we are acutely aware of any threat to our safety and/or brand integrity, and the urge to respond quickly and forcefully to threats is embedded deeply in our DNA.

Amme urges us not to allow our flight-or-fight instincts to rule our actions.

Over the years, crisis counselors have urged clients to “tell the truth, tell it all, tell it quickly,” which often results in an overblown response that only draws more attention to the situation than it would have received otherwise.

Before you release the hounds, consider the size and scope of the problem, and respond accordingly. Amme correctly points out that doing nothing is sometimes the best course of action.

My favorite piece of advice from Amme is an area that I especially enjoy when handling a crisis (if it’s possible to “enjoy” a crisis):

“Have great talking points.” You should first develop answers to the worst-case questions people will likely ask, if time permits. Yes, talking points give important focus to comments, but your credibility rests on your ability to answer tough, legitimate questions.

He couldn’t be more right. Spokespersons are so wrapped up in what they’re going to say that they forget that there will come a time for Q&A, and it’s likely someone will throw out a question from left field.

What you say is important, but what the public (via the news media or directly through social channels) wants—and feels they have a right—to know.

Your crisis plan is important and everyone should have one, but it’s even more important to have sound thinkers working the plan when you’re in a jam.

Smart thinking beats quick action every time.

Leave a Comment

Filed under crisis communications, Uncategorized

The Trouble With Kids Today

Does when you were born affect the way you feel about brands?

And do recent economic and demographic trends have an impact on communications crises?

I don’t know the answers to these questions, but a recent article got me to thinking about how expectations, recessions, social media and spare time can impact business today.

Rebecca Lindland has a thoughtful piece in Forbes this week about the youth of America, and how generational differences are cropping up in the form of American Idol contestants. Lindland cites research from DYG Research and IHS Consumer Markets on Gen Y (born between 1978 and 1987) and those born in 1988 and after, as two distinct groups:

“Generation Y isn’t what conventional wisdom and demographers alike first thought: it isn’t one big giant mass of 80 million kids. Instead, it is two very different, very unique cohorts—Generation Y and what I call Generation Green—both about the same size but growing up in very different environs.

Currently 24-35 years old, [Generation Y contestants] were brash and self-possessed in their youth, and American Idol provided the ultimate stage, inviting these kids to display their talent in the public eye. Social media was still relatively young, and YouTube wasn’t around yet. It appealed to the sharpest expressions of this young cohort – self-absorbed, obsessed with fun, and chock full of self-confidence (DYG). This was their own personal platform – and they could bring their equally fascinating, blindly (deafly?) supportive helicopter parents along for the ride to riches.

Generation Green, born after 1988 and currently 24 or younger, is the first generation to grow up with hybrid AND electric cars from mainstream brands (Toyota Prius, Chevy Volt, and Nissan Leaf) as part of their buying options, and they recycle religiously…Long before the Occupy movement, DYG research predicted these kids would take ‘part in a demonstration, rally or protest to promote a social or political cause’.”

Combined, the two generations comprise 80 million Americans, roughly a quarter of the population, are the biggest users of social media, and are hardest hit by the recession.

On the one hand, there are 40 million Americans who were raised in a boom economy, whose self-esteem was valued to the point of absurdity (“everybody gets a ribbon!”), who experienced impressive personal and financial success in their early 20s, and whose expectations are perhaps a bit unrealistic.

On the other, 40 million Americans who’ve seen the darker realities of our economy yet retain a Utopian vision for the world.

Add to this mix a boatload of social media savvy and the popularly held belief that their plight is due to the greed and misbehavior of the fortunate few, and you have a recipe for trouble.

Last week’s #McFail may be an example. For those who missed it, as part of its strategy to promote relationships with family farmers and other “good guy” suppliers, McDonald’s launched a Twitter campaign using the hashtag #McDStories. Perhaps predictably, the hashtag elicited all manner of deliciously evil anecdotes, and the Golden Arches quickly killed the campaign.

Domino’s Pizza employees posting YouTube videos of themselves doing yucky things with people’s food could be another. (The two employees charged with crimes were aged 31 and 32, respectively, making them members of Gen Y.)

One could even make a case for the Occupy movement (although these groups count members from all walks of life and age groups) being a natural consequence of these forces. (One could make the same case for the Tea Party movement by viewing the opposite side of this same coin.)

Even if your company’s social justice policies are otherwise beyond reproach, if your corporate commissary dispenses coffee that was picked by child laborers and sold at below-fair-market prices, be prepared to hear about it. The first attack will come via social media, then the MSM, and then social media again as the “news” gets picked up and amplified.

For the record, I’m a member of Generation X, the group that brought you manky flannel, grunge music and Monica Lewinsky…so my peers and I are not without blame. And who knows what we would have done during the 1990-93 recession had we had access to social media.

Crises come from all angles, are perpetrated by all manner of people and recent events could simply be a reflection of the times.

Or, this could be the new normal.

Leave a Comment

Filed under crisis communications, Issues Management, Social Media, Uncategorized

When the Media Ride Shotgun With Ambulance Chasers

Two powerful articles this past week on the plight of Toyota and the “sticking accelerator” farce.

In “Toyota: The Media Owe You an Apology,” Bloomberg BusinessWeek columnist Ed Wallace points out that CBS News gleefully launched the hysteria with a lead-story report featuring the frantic 911 call of Jim Sikes, whose Toyota Prius was traveling 94 miles per hour even though he swore he was standing on the brake pedal.

Fast forward 11 months later, when an extensive investigation led by the NHTSA and NASA concluded that the overwhelming majority of runaway Toyotas were a result of improperly installed floor mats or “operator error.” Or in the words of Transportation Secretary Roy LaHood, “pedal misapplication.”

Just the same, Wallace notes that CBS reporter Sandra Hughes used the term “Toyota deaths” in her Feb. 8 report on the NHTSA/NASA report.

Never let the facts stand in the way of a ratings-grabbing punchline.

Eric Dezenhall of The Daily Beast takes the issue a step further, labeling Toyota the victim of “crisis capitalists.”

“There are [not] only rewards in the form of media attention, extortionate legal settlements, Pulitzer Prizes, and the sociopathic euphoria of seeing a cultural caterpillar burned alive under a magnifying glass.

God forbid any successful business be left unmolested. The destruction of a for-profit enterprise is always noble; its defense always carries the whiff of mendacity.”

Dezenhall reaches back to the case involving the similar case that brought down Audi in the 1980s, noting that then as now, the truth was on the side of the manufacturers and not their accusers.

Which brings up a scary point.

In an age when the public views corporations as residing somewhere between pond scum and slug slime, what can you do to protect your reputation when the media feeding frenzy starts with the first drops of blood in the water?

I’d bet Toyota had a gag order once the government investigation began, so what were they to do but issue the recalls, pay the fines and pray for the nightmare to end?

I don’t know that I have a ready answer, other than to say that it pays to be paranoid.

Pretend for a minute that you’re a personal injury attorney and examine your business. Where are your weak spots? What steps can you take now to develop the messages and materials necessary to defend yourself should someone come after your livelihood?

Perhaps the best defense in time of crisis is a good offense.

But one thing is clear: when it all hits the fan, the media will not be on your side.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Issues Management

“Humanize” Crisis Responses When Using Social Media

I stumbled across this post from Aliza Sherman of Gigoam today while doing some homework for a client.

While the post itself is pretty much Crisis Communications 101, what stands out to me is the difference between the traditional crisis response statements that we’ve been trained to create and the manner in which Sherman counsels we us to respond via social media.

Of her eight tips, point number four really stands out:

Acknowledge first. Once you figure out what has happened and what some of the emotions are behind it, make sure to address these issues or emotions in your responses. Like any good interpersonal communications, start with statements like “I understand you’re frustrated” or “We realize this is a confusing situation.” Give credence to the other party’s feelings and perceptions. They may not be correct, but they are valid in that they’re what they believe and feel.

I think we’re so accustomed to crafting boiler plate statements such as, “the safety and well-being of our customers is always our primary concern….bla bla bla,” that we forget that social media is me (and individual) having a conversation with you (someone concerned enough about the problem—real or imagined—that you felt compelled to tweet or publish a post about it.)

In these instances, communicators should leave the lawyer speak behind and engage on a more personal level.

Or face the consequences of a public flogging in the twitterverse.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Issues Management, Listening, Social Media

YouTube Goes Live Tonight

YouTube tonight will test a new streaming video service, developed in partnership with Howcast, Next New Networks, Rocketboom and Young Hollywood.

While stressing in its corporate blog that this is only a test, the prospect of providing viewers with live streaming video, and giving them the opportunity to comment and interact with one another as the programming unfolds, could usher in a new era in television content development.

Imagine knowing what viewers were thinking about plot lines, characters, scripts, music, etc. as stories are unfolding? What could this mean for programs such as Lost or The Event (which many speculate could become the next Lost), Mad Men or daily soap operas (who’ve seen their audiences in decline).

For PR firms and our clients, it could offer a new way to deliver news conferences, particularly in times of crisis. All one needs in order to tap the new YouTube service is a YouTube account and a web cam (or a camera hooked to a computer via fire wire).

Imagine being able to deliver a live response and to direct the public directly to one’s YouTube channel, where a member of the marketing team could monitor and/or interact with the public as the event is unfolding?

Could something like this service work in favor of the BPs of the world the next time disaster strikes?

I’m hoping that tonight’s test is a huge success and I look forward to putting streaming video to work for my clients in the near future.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Creativity, Listening, Social Media

Ever Feel Like You’re Playing Whac-a-Mole?

In the good ol’ days, you pretty much knew who was talking trash about you. They were quoted in the newspaper, sent you hate mail or blasted your customer service reps over the phone.

But in the age of messge boards, blogs and Twitter, your detractors can post pretty much anything they want, ANONYMOUSLY and then disappear in the night faster than the Varmint Cong.

Recently, we’ve begun incorporating a new technology to help us help our clients not only find out who’s saying what about them, but also to separate the lovers from the haters and prioritize our actions by engaging online commentators holding the greatest influence first.

It’s proved to be a tremendous listening tool, and eliminates the old PR trap of mistaking activity for achievement.

 

Leave a Comment

Filed under Issues Management, Listening