Tag Archives: Spiral16

Be Thankful You Have Two Ears and One Mouth

I was poking around today and found a number of “listening” products and services that interested me.

With apologies to TechCrunch, here’s a list of handy tools you might want to incorporate when monitoring social media chatter on your company, its products and services:

Viralheat. This service, which costs between $10 and $40 per month, monitors approximately 30 video sharing Websites and Twitter to capture mentions of your brand. It also analyzes Tweets, Re-tweets by sentiment, enabling you to see whether commentary about you is positive, negative or neutral.

Visible Measures. If you’re using online video advertising and viral video to promote your products and services, you might find VM to be a useful service, which I imagine comes with an upscale price tag. Visible Measures offers a wide range of services, including content development and distribution strategies, as well as conducting thorough analyses of more than 150 video-sharing sites.

Social Seek. This is a free service that enables you to monitor mentions of given keyword in blogs, Twitter, YouTube, Flickr and events pages. I downloaded the software this morning, but haven’t had much luck so far in generating useful feedback. I’ll keep you posted, but I’d appreciate input from anyone familiar with the software.

People Browsr. If you’re a fan of Tweetdeck for managing your Twitter account, this service may be for you. There are many different ways to use People Browsr, and I won’t bore you with every single application they provide, but their My.PeopleBrowsr.com application works like a Tweetdeck on steroids and enables you to integrate multiple “listening” functions into a single interface.

Three are dozens more technologies out there, including upscale services from Radian6, Infegy and Spiral16, but these four may be useful for your business.

Happy Thanksgiving and happy listening.

 

Leave a Comment

Filed under Listening

The Truth About Measuring Social Media

We’re all searching for our own personal Holy Grail.

For 20 years clients have asked me how we measure the success of a public relations campaign. And for 20 years, I’ve provided answers that includes pre- and post-campaign consumer opinion research, advertising equivalency, gross impressions, etc.

But I’ve never really “known” for sure. It’s incredibly difficult (if not impossible) to connect the dots between sustained positive publicity and sales and customer loyalty.

Close, but no Grail.

And the social media revolution has only clouded the picture, as now marketers are expected to connect a wider array of dots to demonstrate that a post on a well-read Mommy blog somehow generated greater impact on your bottom line than a 90-second feature on your local television news station. (In reality, it would be great if you got both “hits.”)

The traditional clipping service has been replaced by all manner of technology companies, who promise to fire up their Web engines and show you who’s saying what about your products and services, which bloggers, tweeters and news sites wield the greatest influence, and how all of this Internet chatter is woven together.

One of my favorite terms to come out of this revolution is “share of influence,” which is about as Emperor’s New Clothes as it gets.

As Asi Sharabi recently pointed out in his No Man’s Blog, you can spend a lot of time separating the wheat from the chaff and still not know much more about your brand’s standing in the public consciousness than you would by Googling yourself.

From what I’ve seen, he’s right. Most of the companies cites (no need for me to name names) offer up a garbage in-garbage out accounting of who-said-what-to-whom.

One exception, in my opinion, is an Overland Park, Kan.-based group called Spiral 16.

I’ve been using their Spark software off and on for the past six months, and I’ve found it useful in helping me work more efficiently for my clients by sniffing out opportunities and threats that we otherwise wouldn’t know about and then prioritizing our activities using this knowledge.

It helps prevent us from falling into the “mistaking activity with achievement” trap that befalls so many in the public relations profession. We are no longer forced to do the “dump and chase” routine of issuing news releases and then making a million follow-up calls—we can actually engage our customers, prospects and influencers where they live and via the information they consume.

The truth is, we cannot accurately measure social media yet. But we can use these monitoring devices to keep our fees down and generate greater bang for the buck.

Something that all clients can (and do) appreciate these days.

Not the Holy Grail….but not bad.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Return On Investment, Social Media

Ever Feel Like You’re Playing Whac-a-Mole?

In the good ol’ days, you pretty much knew who was talking trash about you. They were quoted in the newspaper, sent you hate mail or blasted your customer service reps over the phone.

But in the age of messge boards, blogs and Twitter, your detractors can post pretty much anything they want, ANONYMOUSLY and then disappear in the night faster than the Varmint Cong.

Recently, we’ve begun incorporating a new technology to help us help our clients not only find out who’s saying what about them, but also to separate the lovers from the haters and prioritize our actions by engaging online commentators holding the greatest influence first.

It’s proved to be a tremendous listening tool, and eliminates the old PR trap of mistaking activity for achievement.

 

Leave a Comment

Filed under Issues Management, Listening